点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
赴一场工美与非遗的盛宴******
展品《大吉图》（皮影）
薛宏权
中国工艺美术馆、中国非物质文化遗产馆供图
明亮宽敞的中国工艺美术馆、中国非物质文化遗产馆大厅中，一棵高大的不锈钢“树”引得不少观众驻足观看。艺术家刘恒甫的雕塑《中华福树》线条流畅简约，将中国传统绘画中树的造型立体化、当代化。这棵枝干互联、硕果累累的中华福树，展现着顶天立地、生生不息的精神，寓意向心向上、繁荣昌盛，是“人类命运共同体”的美好诠释。
1月1日起，中国工艺美术馆、中国非物质文化遗产馆恢复开放。同时，四场新展览“祭如在——中国艺术研究院藏明清祖容像展”、“松纳柴器——景德镇陶瓷柴窑烧造技艺展”、“影戏人间：陕西非遗皮影展”、“天地人文——刘恒甫公共艺术展”也同步与观众见面。
祭祖是中华民族源远流长、丰富深厚的传统，孝老爱亲、慎终追远、敬宗睦族更是自古传承的家族美德。祖容像作为祭祖文化的象征物，是维系家族情感的物质载体，承载着丰富的历史与人文内涵；同时，因在绘制时注重如实反映祖先样貌及所穿服饰，祖容像也是中国人物绘画的集大成者。
本次“祭如在——中国艺术研究院藏明清祖容像展”中展出的中国艺术研究院明清祖容像藏品，数量可观、质量上乘，绝大多数藏品为首次展示。其中最引人注目的是一套较为完整的“多罗顺承郡王家族祖容像”，自第七世多罗顺承忠郡王诺罗布至十二世多罗顺承简郡王伦柱共六代郡王、五代王妃，共计11幅作品。不仅可以帮助我们了解清代王府祭祖规制，也可通过作品的不同绘制风格了解清代北方祖容像绘制技法和样式的演变。
景德镇的千年窑火，烧出了中国陶瓷的灿烂、照亮了世界陶瓷大道。千百年来，窑炉营造和烧造技艺赓续精华、创新不辍。在当代，景德镇的陶瓷工匠通过对窑炉不断研究、探索、改进、试烧，形成了名为“松纳柴器”的艺术柴窑。这种窑炉既能复烧各历史时期的景德镇陶瓷作品，也能充分满足当代各种陶瓷艺术的烧制条件，可以生动展现“入窑一色出窑万彩”的神奇魅力。
“松纳柴器——景德镇陶瓷柴窑烧造技艺展”中呈现的百余件作品，由几十位中国工艺美术大师、国家级非遗传承人、中国陶瓷艺术大师、教授、省级工艺美术大师等创作，使用“松纳柴器”窑炉烧制而成，展示了当代艺术陶瓷和柴窑的历史内涵和时代价值。
2011年11月27日，联合国教科文组织宣布，中国皮影戏列入《人类非物质文化遗产代表作名录》。有着“一口叙说千古事，双手对舞百万兵”美誉的皮影戏历经千年承传流变，是中华优秀传统文化的重要组成部分。中国皮影戏集美术造型、文学剧本、音乐唱腔、表演技艺于一体，有着较为完整的艺术体系、鲜明的民族特色和高度的美学成就，反映着中国人特有的审美观念、思想情感和精神追求。
陕西是中国皮影戏的发祥地之一。陕西皮影戏影响几乎遍及陕北、陕南及关中各地，深受当地民众喜爱，是近代陕西多种地方戏曲的前身。皮影雕工至臻精美，镂空与留实巧妙搭配，造型优美生动、有韵有势、繁简得宜、虚实相生，极富特色；唱腔类型多样，碗碗腔细腻婉转、阿宫腔清悠秀婉、弦板腔明快清脆、老腔刚直高亢，影响广泛深远。本次“影戏人间：陕西非遗皮影展”是“中华瑰宝”系列展览的又一次全新呈现，共展出陕西非遗皮影相关展品约200件。（黄敬惟）
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
（文图：赵筱尘 巫邓炎） [责编：天天中] 阅读剩余全文（）  视觉焦点
玛雅彩票地图 |
)